You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #214: Uh, I already did answer that question. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
Exiled in America Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-28-07 05:43 PM
Response to Reply #165
214. Uh, I already did answer that question.
Edited on Tue Aug-28-07 05:44 PM by Exiled in America
All things being equal, yes, its a great idea essential to healthy relationships to discuss and have open communication about major life decisions that impact more than one person.

Talk to any therapist, sociologist, social worker, LCSW or read any journal on mental health and wellness - hell, just be a basic human being, and you discover that this fact is not in any serious dispute anywhere. You're being up in arms about it is your problem - a silly attempt to make an issue where there is no issue. And there is just a mountain lode of statistical research to support this very basic claim. It isn't any more controversial than saying the sky is blue.

Context matters, and there are certainly times where that kind of open communication isn't desireable or healthy, and no one is questioning that ultimately the choice rests with the woman.

It's just basic fucking social work to realize that when possible, open communication between partners about major life decisions is important.

Yes, there are people who have inappropriate views about it. There are people who think the father is "entitled" to some kind of a "say" in the decision, and that's false. They're are people who act like the woman can't be responsible to make a decision for herself and that's false. But that's not the issue here. The issue here, is you trying to make a "thing" where there is no thing, and you need to get off it.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC