Reply #267: Read rule two [View All]

[MADem]

I can attack your ARGUMENTS until the cows come home. I can say that your ARGUMENTS are foolish, immature and childish. And that they're horseshit. I can also tell you, when you are boorish, that you are boorish and acting like an asshole--after all, the evidence is right here on this thread, you typed it with your own earnest fingers.

What I cannot do is get into "I bet you" territory that attacks you personally, as opposed to attacking simply your ARGUMENTS. Examples (and these are general examples, mind you, not directed at you): I bet you are a fucking unemployed pimple faced, overweight nearsighted wanker who lives in your mother's basement. I'll bet you've been fired from every MacDonald's job you managed to get. I'll bet you're not only stupid, but ugly, and have never had a date in your life. And, of course, the piece de resistance: I'll bet you are a rightwing, Freeper troll who comes over here to fuck with people and then runs back to your rightwing den and laughts with your buddies. See, those are PERSONAL attacks that go to who you are as a person. I don't do that. You do, though.

Saying that your arguments are a load of stinking excrement is not a personal attack. That's responding to your severe and obvious paucity of logic.

But hey, whatever. Go on, you hit that ignore button, kid. I dare ya. You don't bother me. You aren't very good at debate and you don't know your subject matter very well. You're just a one-note wonder, repeating the same childish taunts and halfassed, poorly thought out arguments, over and over again, all over this thread. Because that's all you've got.

Go on, tell me one more time (you've only done it, what, four, five times in varying locations here? Ooooh!!! Oooooh! A bit 'obsessive,' that...) how I'm not "allowed" to have my signature picture because I live in the real world, and won't get on your Pelosi-hating, Impeachment Dreamgirls Bandwagon....because YOU make the rules around here about signature pictures, apparently. :rofl:

And one more time--unless Pat Leahy comes up with something, there's no EVIDENCE to impeach Bush. It would be nice if there were, but there isn't.

Even if you don't happen to like that unfortunate fact.