You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Fed investigation into Edwards mistress $ is for “honest services fraud” [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
Adelante Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-07-09 11:41 AM
Original message
Fed investigation into Edwards mistress $ is for “honest services fraud”
Advertisements [?]
Frank Perry is retired from the FBI and works for non-profit Foundation for Ethics in Public Service.


Feds probing Edwards affair
Thursday, May 07, 2009 | 11:58 AM

-snip

“It is the FBI that makes a determination of that allegation, to see if it’s credible, specific and coherent enough to proceed,” he said. “I think many people wrongly believe US attorneys generate public corruption cases, but the initiation, the vetting, the working of the case, the FBI is driving that train and it’s done with a true abundance of caution, fairness, and you want to be as firm and fast as you are fair.”

In 2006 and 2007, Edwards’ political action committee paid Hunter $114,000 to produce videos of Edwards. Federal investigators are trying to figure out if those payments violated federal law.

Perry is not connected to the Edwards investigation, but says political corruption cases focus on a federal law - called “honest services fraud”.

“Honest services means that a public official has done something that deprives the citizens of the honest services they expect from public officials,” he explained.

-snip

“It can take some time to build a case,” he said. “And honest services case can take a lot of effort and can be extremely time consuming with respect to going through the financial records and following that money.”

While it appears the investigation is being conducted in Raleigh, Perry says political corruption cases have a lot of oversight - from both FBI headquarters in Washington and the Justice Department in Washington.


http://abclocal.go.com/wtvd/story?section=news/local&id=6801133

I actually don't see this getting anywhere in the end. Mistress or not, there was a product purchased from a legal company for use by the campaign. The job was fulfilled even if use of the product was limited. The only thing I see tripping them up on this is if the financial records were somehow finagled to wash the cash. I dunno.

Am I missing something? :shrug:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC