Evidence Showing Pelosi Must Recuse Herself On Impeachment [View All]

[Phred42]

Well - I guess she really IS protecting Bush & Cheney.

The Democratic 'Leadership' are, and have been, the Silent partners of the Reich all along.

We must remove Pelosi FIRST - Ony Then can we Impeach the Bastards

Reid - your next up for removal

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~


Evidence Showing Pelosi Must Recuse Herself On Impeachment

http://tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/2008/06/evidence-showing-pelosi-must-r.php

Apparently, Pelosi was involved with policy making decisions on torture and NSA surveillance. Either Pelosi recuses herself and makes way for an impeachment investigation -- which may implicate her as an alleged co-conspirator; or the House must remove Pelosi as Speaker for her alleged ethics breaches and refusal to permit the House to enforce the laws of war through impeachment.

Have you wondered why Speaker Pelosi took impeachment "off" the table? She made this decision before conducting any fact finding. Or, so she wants us to believe.
The (apparent) truth is surprising. Information has been developed, and forwarded to Congressman Conyers, strongly suggesting Pelosi knows far more than she's admitting.
This week, Professor Turley accused the Congress of collusion. There's aparently some substance to this allegation.
Apparently, Pelosi was involved with policy making decisions on torture and NSA surveillance. We've also learned Harman knew some things, but didn't say something.
David writes, implicitly suggesting Pelosi must recuse herself:

Pelosi's criminal participation and duties can be defined even more clearly, since she participated in discussions of both warrantless surveillance and torture -- Articles 24 and 18 of the Impeachment case.