You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.

Latest

Greatest

Lobby

Journals

Options

Help

Reply #108: Rogers justification for outing these staffers doesn't withstand scrutiny [View All]

Printer-friendly format

Email this thread to a friend

Bookmark this thread

This topic is archived.

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007)

onenote

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Tue Oct-10-06 04:44 PM
Response to Original message

108. Rogers justification for outing these staffers doesn't withstand scrutiny

Rogers letter suggests that these two gay men should be investigated to see what role they played in the Foley scandal/cover up because they "have a vested interest in protecting a man like Mark Foley so that the majority party can stay in power".

Well, those two repub staffers would have the same "vested interest" in protecting Mark Foley so that the repubs would stay in power whether or not they were straight, closeted gays, open gays, bi-sexual or eunuchs.

Gratuitous, imo.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007)

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate

About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.