You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #3: Questions are best ended with question marks. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
Rabrrrrrr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-29-06 12:15 PM
Response to Original message
3. Questions are best ended with question marks.
A few suggestions -

When did Bob Woodward say what you quote him as saying, and can you cite the source? I have a feeling he did not say that, since one clause doesn't make sense. If you are going to quote, you must quote exactly, otherwise it's slander (or perjury - I get the two mixed up). Also, you have Bob quoting the President and the DOD - that quote needs to be in quotes as well.

Iraqi's is possessive, not plural. Thats is supposed to be a contraction, so it should be "that's", but using contractions in formal writing is ugly, so use "that is". Please put spaces after punctuation.

When you say "As a veteran of the Vietnem war I heard this same old song then", what do you mean by "then"? Perhaps rewriting as, "I was a soldier in the Vietnam War, and I heard that same old song then", assuming that's what you meant. "J.Dennis" should have a space between J. and Dennis, and it should be set off by commas. Committees does not need capitalization in that context; chairmen might not, either, but I am not actually sure in that case.

Don't say we have "lost" people - speak the truth. They've been killed. They are dead.

You have Wes Clark saying something, but you don't end the quote anywhere - use a quote mark to separate it off. And then the phrase 'stay the course' should be in single quotes, like I just did it.

I would move the third paragraph to be the second paragraph. And then explain in the (new) third paragraph what you mean by "NIC report" - say something about the contents, like "The NIC report, from the (whatever organization did it, I forget the groups that worked on it) that clearly states we've created more terrorists, made us less safe, and put America more in danger than it ever has been". Something like that.

Other than these grammar nits, though, that's it - the content is fantastic! I love the imagery of how many attacks an hour we're actually getting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC