You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #67: OK, it can work like this [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
Jack Rabbit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 11:00 PM
Response to Original message
67. OK, it can work like this
First, we get Menendez elected to the Senate. Hopefully, that means the Democrats will have a majority and, along with the their majority in the House, will investigate the manipulation of intelligence prior to the Iraq invasion, the NSA wiretapping program and so on ans so forth. Oh, just for good measure, be sure to investigate how the Big Dick arranged for Halliburton to get big, fat contracts on a no bid basis.

Then, after the investigations and after the House sends a few articles of impeachment over to the Senate, Menendez can vote to convict the two war criminals, ending this unhappy chapter in American history.

Unfortunately, the job still isn't finished. Because of the votes today, Bush and Cheney, by an act of Congress, are not war criminals. By an act of Congress, they never ordered any one to torture anybody. And by an act of Congress, torture isn't torture.

So, if we want to try them for war crimes, then we will first have to find a court with jurisdiction. That can't be an American court because COngress, with Senator Menendez voting Aye, exonerated the regime's war criminals. If we want these people to face justice -- and I do -- we'll just have to ask an international tribunal to hear the case, because no American court can.

Now, I believe shielding war criminals by a legislative act is a war crime in itself. It is possible that an international tribunal might to talk the members of the world's most exclusive club about this and what reasons they had or what the fuck they thought they were doing by voting to shield these thugs from prosecution for acts of torture. The tribunal just may agree with me.

And I know this is Democratic Underground, but quite frankly I cannot think of a fair or valid argument for saying that Republican Senators and Congressmen who voted Aye the last two days should be sent to The Hague for voting to shield war criminals from prosecution in US courts, but not Democratic Senators and Congressmen. Can anybody?

So let's put him Menendez and the other Democrats who voted to shield war criminals today (but not the de facto Republican Lieberman) back in the Senate and House and then, if they are indicted by an international tribunal, agree to send Senator Menendez and the others to The Hague.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC