You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Spellings Ed Dept. says, "No" to more Pell grants. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
donco6 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-27-06 12:34 PM
Original message
Spellings Ed Dept. says, "No" to more Pell grants.
Advertisements [?]
Edited on Wed Sep-27-06 01:21 PM by donco6
But "Yes" to requiring a phenomenally expensive system for tracking student progress from preK to postgrad.

Yeah! That makes sense.


Education Secretary Margaret Spellings called yesterday for greater fiscal and academic accountability in higher education and endorsed a controversial plan to keep long-term records on students that would track performance from the time they enter the system in grade school to show how their educations progress.

The panel proposed that college students undergo testing to ensure that the schools are meeting their academic promises and goals, the results of which would be part of a public database that would help students and parents assess and choose schools. Spellings made the point that few objective measures for judging the quality of a school are available to parents.

The commission recommended increasing the value of Pell Grants to cover 70 percent of the average in-state tuition at public colleges; the grants now cover only 48 percent of tuition. Spellings did call for a complete overhaul and streamlining of the unwieldy college aid system and acknowledged that more money is needed, but she stopped short of endorsing increases in Pell Grants. David L. Warren, president of the National Association of Independent Colleges and Universities, said: "I found that quite remarkable, because it was the key recommendation from the commission. Yet she endorsed a unit record database, which would be enormously expensive to implement."

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/09/26/AR2006092601460.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC