You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #35: I'm not an evangelical, but a left-leaing person motivated by religion [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
Leopolds Ghost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-19-06 10:33 AM
Response to Original message
35. I'm not an evangelical, but a left-leaing person motivated by religion
Edited on Tue Sep-19-06 10:41 AM by Leopolds Ghost
I.e. I am a "radical" Christian who thinks organized religion is no more co-opted by the ruling class than any other organization in American society, which is to say, quite susceptible to co-optation.

Evangelicals and other "Great Awakening" religions used to be a primary source of abolitionist, civil rights, and left-libertarian sentiment in the US.

Abortion and Communism were the primary wedge issues that have driven otherwise left-libertarian Evangelicals into the hands of the right. It did not need to happen that way.

The mainline Protestant churches, after losing many of their affluent members during the 1960s social revolt (when many churches and divinity students, inspired by people like MLK, were on the front lines of said revolt) rolled over in the 1970s and became the tools of local DLC type, upper class "socially liberal -- economically moderate" interests.

Southern and Midwestern mainmline churches went the opposite way, succumbing to statism, discrimination, and in some cases betraying their heritage as anti-establishment sects. The Southern Baptist Conference, for example. The Missouri Synod Lutheran church is another example. Too often these sorts of churches were founded on intolerance of some specific group or cause, such as integration or unionism (which used to be huge in rural Appalachia and the midwest); yet I have come to realize this is true of any movement that attracts enough followers to wield influence.

If the Republican party dissolved overnight, the Dems would quickly split into two or more parties as they had to absorb all those voters. If we were lucky things would fluctuate into a more stable arrangement, with, say a Populist pasrty representing the far Northern states and Midwest, a "New Democrat" (big business) party representing the combined interests of the wealthy Democratic and Republican interests who already control things in the big urban states, and the Dixiecrats would be left with Idaho, the deep South, and whatever states tied between the other two. To quote Toombs: "Three-way split!!!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC