You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Are We "Useful Idiots"? [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
LeahMira Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-14-06 10:17 AM
Original message
Are We "Useful Idiots"?
Advertisements [?]
Why have American liberals acquiesced in President Bush’s catastrophic foreign policy? Why have they so little to say about Iraq, about Lebanon, or about reports of a planned attack on Iran? Why has the administration’s sustained attack on civil liberties and international law aroused so little opposition or anger from those who used to care most about these things? Why, in short, has the liberal intelligentsia of the United States in recent years kept its head safely below the parapet?

It wasn’t always so. On 26 October 1988, the New York Times carried a full-page advertisement for liberalism. Headed ‘A Reaffirmation of Principle’, it openly rebuked Ronald Reagan for deriding ‘the dreaded L-word’ and treating ‘liberals’ and ‘liberalism’ as terms of opprobrium. Liberal principles, the text affirmed, are ‘timeless. Extremists of the right and of the left have long attacked liberalism as their greatest enemy. In our own time liberal democracies have been crushed by such extremists. Against any encouragement of this tendency in our own country, intentional or not, we feel obliged to speak out.’

More at: http://www.lrb.co.uk/v28/n18/judt01_.html

I read (in the September issue of "The Progressive," book review section)that the invasion of Iraq was not an isolated episode, but one more instance of a 110-year long period during which the U.S. has had a central role in overthrowing at least fourteen governments that displeased it for various reasons. Additionally, the U.S. interventions have invariably made things worse in those countries, i.e. Cuba got Batista, the Philippines got Marcos, the Iranians got the Shah, and etc. I don't think very many people know that. I didn't.

Would it help at all if we made it a point to talk about history? If there's truly a liberal intelligensia in this country, why can't it speak to the average person and explain that this "war on terror" is not a clash of civilizations so much as more of the same old pattern that we've repeated over and over again and that we've always managed to make things worse in the long run.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC