What I don't get is that assuming Clinton had the information and means to do more about OBL, why didn't Bush use that same information and means during his first 240 days of office? It's not like Bush came into office unaware of the terrorist threat. He had a transition team; Al Qaeda had been in the news; Clinton had personally warned him; and there had already been several terrorist attacks. It seems to me that using the logic that the right uses, Bush should have gone after OBL and Al Qaeda immediately after getting into office.
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
