You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Does Fox News Channel (and other media outlets) use [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
TheDebbieDee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-01-06 05:44 PM
Original message
Does Fox News Channel (and other media outlets) use
Advertisements [?]
Edited on Fri Sep-01-06 05:45 PM by TheDebbieDee
subliminal messages to imprint the * admin's talking points on unsuspecting viewers? All of the TV networks have participated in the subliminal messaging, but maybe Fox does it more than the others.

After all, wasn't Fox News Channel the first network to report that Gore did not win the election and * was the "rightful" winner of the 2000 election?

Have we, the American people, been the subject of the biggest psyop (psychological operation) experiment since WWII?

I don't know for sure, but I think it is illegal for subliminal messages to be broadcast to the viewing public.......but when have illegalities mattered to the * admin. This group has stolen 2 Presidential Elections, robbed Ann Richardson in Texas, started a war for profit, spied on Americans without search warrants, and probably many other things that we don't even know about yet!

I found the following snippet at: http://skepdic.com/subliminal.html

"In 1974 the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) issued an order saying that broadcast outlets that knowingly carry subliminal ads are operating "contrary to the public interest." In September 2000, Senators Ron Wyden of Oregon and John Breaux of Louisiana complained to the FCC about a Republican ad that flashed the word ''RATS'' (or "BUREAUCRATS") across the screen for 1/30 of a second. ''We have reason to believe that broadcasters are airing television advertisements that contain subliminal messages in violation of the public interest,'' they said, apparently oblivious to the fact that something which can't be registered by the brain is unlikely to have any effect on viewers and is unlikely to violate anything except the reasonable bounds of credulity."

Surely, the repuke party did not start and stop their fiddling around with subliminal messaging with this lone incident.

What do you think?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC