You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #5: It wouldn't mean anything. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
Nicholas D Wolfwood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-14-06 12:01 PM
Response to Original message
5. It wouldn't mean anything.
I personally loathe the two party system, but that's the reality we face. There's exactly one scenario that would threaten the system, and here it is (brace yourselves for this one):

John McCain running as an Independent/Third Party candidate.

If McCain ran as a 3rd Partier, there would be great potential for no one candidate obtaining more than 270 electoral votes. Democrats and Republicans alike would wind up abandoning their party to vote for him, and one could easily see him winning a number of "purple" and red-leaning states. Granted, I think the results would be much different today, but let's use 2004 for an example.

If McCain ran 3rd party in 2004, there's a strong chance he'd wind up taking Arizona, Nevada, New Mexico, Colorado, Montana, Iowa, Ohio, and Michigan. I'm guessing he'd win a few more too, but we'll just leave it at that for now (the numbers work out tidier this way). That'd drop Bush to 234, drop Kerry to 234, and give McCain 70. Now, that clearly wouldn't be enough to give him the election, or even serious consideration, however, what it would do is send the election to the House of Representatives, where a very serious discussion would be forced to take place.

The Members of the House would each cast their vote for President and it would be a simple winner-take-all. The dilemma would be this: does a Congressman stay loyal to his/her party or do they stay loyal to their constituents and vote the way they did?

This would obviously not be such an easy choice for lot of them to make, and I gather they'd wind up with just enough for Bush to win anyway, but it's easy to see how serious the implications would be if a serious third party candidate wound up running.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC