You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #75: I'm really confused? [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
sheelz Donating Member (869 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-19-06 07:53 AM
Response to Reply #64
75. I'm really confused?
You say your a lawyer but you didn't answer my question when I asked if incompetence is a crime?

Then you said "Bush could be both, but the motives aren't as important as the actions." Since when are motives not important to a lawyer?

Then you asked me if we are agreeing or disagreeing. I've never seen a lawyer unable to tell whether someone is agreeing or disagreeing with them. Did my stance change? Did yours? If so, then how?

Then you said this, "His education, high-level jobs, etc. would preclude this - just the fact that he can read would preclude this." Do you have a link for this. Mental health experts make that decision mot lawyers.

I thought lawyers had great analytical skills, perhaps I'm wrong.

One more try:

Here is your example of Bush's incompetence: "I don't think anyone could look at the mess in Iraq & see competence. The difference is that Bush & co. are incompetent through sheer arrogance. They don't care about the result, or are so absolutely convinced of their own delusions that they won't listen to those w/more experience or knowledge. Then the reality crumbles around them. I truly believe that Bush did think they'd be greeted with flowers & parades when they entered Iraq. They did think they could install Chalabi & cruise right into Syria. That wasn't very competent of them. And really, I think their incompetence is the Achilles' heel of this regime - they even manage to screw up their own evil plans."

Here is what his daddy thought: In explaining to Gulf War veterans why he chose not to pursue the war further, he said, "whose life would be on my hands as the commander-in-chief because I, unilaterally, went beyond the international law, went beyond the stated mission, and said we're going to show our macho? We're going into Baghdad. We're going to be an occupying power — America in an Arab land — with no allies at our side. It would have been disastrous."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_H._W._Bush

He ignored what his poppy refused to do and that was his choice. That's not incompetence it's willful disregard.


Peace.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC