You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

NSA's Hayden denied foreknowledge of 9/11 despite intercepts [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
phoebe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-25-06 12:55 PM
Original message
NSA's Hayden denied foreknowledge of 9/11 despite intercepts
Advertisements [?]
so why does the Bush Admin. go on and on about keeping us safe from terrorists and using the NSA to do so..anyone else see the laughable irony??

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/9149402/site/newsweek

The issue at the heart of the Tenet matter—the role in the intelligence community of the NSA, which eavesdrops on telecommunications through a sophisticated worldwide electronic-monitoring network—also inevitably raises questions about the NSA’s former director, Lt. Gen. Michael Hayden, who has since been named by Bush to be principal deputy to the new director of national intelligence, John Negroponte. A spokesman for Hayden's office declined to comment on the CIA document.

The long-awaited CIA report—and its tough criticisms—have been roiling the U.S. intelligence community at least since last fall when, according to several accounts, Inspector General John Helgerson's office finished drafting it and sent it forward to Goss. But the CIA didn't deliver the document to the House and Senate Intelligence Committees—which had asked the CIA to conduct an internal review in response to Congress's own 9/11 inquiry—until last week. Intelligence officials say the delay was necessary in order to give current and former officials an opportunity to respond to the report's contentious contents.


more importantly:
http://www.cooperativeresearch.org/context.jsp?item=a101702hayden

October 17, 2002: NSA Denies Having Indications of 9/11 Planning


NSA Director Michael Hayden testifies before a Congressional inquiry that the “NSA had no that al-Qaeda was specifically targeting New York and Washington ... or even that it was planning an attack on US soil.” Before 9/11, the “NSA had no knowledge ... that any of the attackers were in the United States.” Supposedly, a post-9/11 NSA review found no intercepts of calls involving any of the 19 hijackers. <9/11 Congressional Inquiry, 10/17/02; USA Today, 10/18/02; Reuters, 10/17/02> However, such hijacker calls were intercepted by the NSA (for instance, (see Spring-Summer 2000)).

People and organizations involved: National Security Agency, al-Qaeda, Michael Hayden


October 17, 2002: NSA Denies Having Indications of 9/11 Planning


NSA Director Michael Hayden testifies before the 9/11 Congressional Inquiry that the “NSA had no that al-Qaeda was specifically targeting New York and Washington ... or even that it was planning an attack on US soil.” Before 9/11, the “NSA had no knowledge ... that any of the attackers were in the United States.” Supposedly, a post-9/11 NSA review found no intercepts of calls involving any of the 19 hijackers. Yet, in the summer of 2001 (see Summer 2001), the NSA intercepted communications between Khalid Shaikh Mohammed, the mastermind of the 9/11 attacks, and hijacker Mohamed Atta, when he was in charge of operations in the US. What was said between the two has not been revealed. The NSA also intercepted multiple phone calls from Abu Zubaida, bin Laden's chief of operations, to the US in the days before 9/11 (see Early September 2001). But who was called or what was said has not been revealed.




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC