You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #27: I rank him higher than Kennedy [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
Zomby Woof Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-14-06 09:36 PM
Response to Reply #24
27. I rank him higher than Kennedy
The most overrated Democrat of all the presidents. Don't get me started on that huckster and charlatan. Only Howard Dean invokes more disgust in me than any Democrat in recent history.

As for FDR - he was great in some ways - rallying the nation during the Depression and willing to experiment, and for his steadfastness in WW2 - and not so good, even worse than Clinton in others. The internment of Japanese-Americans, and his refusal to support anti-lynching laws, or his lame attempt to pack the Supreme Court - not exactly sainthood material.

Some of the things Clinton gets maligned for, like welfare reform, were needed, and not conservative, just common sense. As for his failures, I consider NAFTA a well-meaning mistake, costly as it was. But unlike why the GOP supported it, Clinton's idealism and ability to compromise betrayed him. But I do not think his motives were "selling out" or kowtowing to corporate greed. He really did want it to help workers here and abroad. It IS true that old-style protectionism is a dinosaur; it's just the way free trade has been rigged falsely as a cure-all to it that lured many Democrats to support it.

LBJ - would have been the best of the 20th century if not for Kennedy leaving him Vietnam, and his blind determination to follow through with it. His civil rights advances were simply the best since Reconstruction and the post-Civil War amendments. We still benefit from these advances today.

Truman - his attacks on union strikers was the worst anti-labor action by any Democrat since Grover Cleveland. And his creation of the NSA and other arms of the modern police state we live in makes Truman a kind of godfather of the neocons. Truman was once the president I wanted to admire most, but I have so many reservations about him that I barely rank him above FDR.

Carter - the most honorable and moral man to occupy the Oval Office since Lincoln or John Quincy Adams. I DO admire him more than anyone in this post. But his presidency - other than the Camp David accords, addressing energy issues (creating ANWR too), and the Panama Canal Treaty (pissed off the GOP didn't it?), was sadly disappointing. Although he did not deserve to lose to the excrecably criminal Reagan... So many lost opportunities for Carter. But he tried his best and he was honest. We may never have anyone like that in the office again.

So maybe McGraw DID do his homework. Clinton could have been a lot better, but so could have the others so iconically held up by most here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC