You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.

Latest

Greatest

Lobby

Journals

Options

Help

Reply #6: You didn't criticize him for being a sexist, but for dating. [View All]

Printer-friendly format

Email this thread to a friend

Bookmark this thread

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Women's Rights

Inland

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Tue May-24-05 11:59 AM
Response to Reply #5

6. You didn't criticize him for being a sexist, but for dating.

Dating strippers, to be precise, because he couldn't get laid otherwise. Oh, and that married (monogamous) men don't have fun sex anymore, which of course, is not an equal rights issue.

If you had criticized him for ideas rather than his sex life, I wouldn't have made the post and you would be able to credibly say that you don't want to ban sex.

So if you want to discuss sexism, then you should discuss ideas. If you don't want to discuss someone's sex life, then you really shouldn't go over their dating and whether they pay for it.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Women's Rights

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate

About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.