You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #5: Interesting that they were 6 point underdogs [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Sports Donate to DU
JonLP24 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-19-09 01:36 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. Interesting that they were 6 point underdogs
Edited on Mon Oct-19-09 01:38 AM by JonLP24
All the talking heads on ESPN picked Seattle, all the fantasy "experts" said start Matt Hasselbeck because of the Cardinals 'D' (who btw have are the #1 rush defense in the league), Seahawks were 2-0 with Matt Hasselbeck(former MVP) playing a complete game(2 of the other losses Seneca Wallace was the starter), and they were at home where they put up 2 shut-outs but because the Cardinals won and held Hasselbeck to 112 passing yards it was because Seattle is no barometer.

I wouldn't look too much last year, the defense missed tackles all the time last year and that was the #1 thing I watched for this year and they are making those open field tackles. Pass defense is the only thing that has been consistent. They have been consistent at stopping the run(#1 in the league), have 13 sacks, 7 turnovers, and 2 defensive touchdowns. Plus the passing offense has been consistent for every game this season.

The 49ers are playing good football this year with the exception of the Falcons game, the Colts game looks bad but they had 2 turnovers inside the 5 and one of those Boldin was grabbed and pulled but there was no call and Manning has 5 straight 300+ passing yard games this season so it's hard to fault the Cardinals as no one has yet to slow down Manning either.

Since you say Arizona's inconsistency is not likely to change does not mean it isn't because you say but they have been pretty consistent in several aspects of the game and for Seattle to be such a low barometer they beat them in convincing fashion like they were supposed to if they are that lowly of a team. I don't know or you don't know what's going to happen but there is a reason they do it on the field rather than bullshit on a message board. Anyways very few teams are playing consistent and many of those teams that are won close games that could have easily gone the other way(with the exception of the Saints).

Have a good day. :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Sports Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC