You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #97: Isn't the term "weak atheist"? [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Religion/Theology Donate to DU
Donald Ian Rankin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-23-06 06:12 PM
Response to Reply #56
97. Isn't the term "weak atheist"?

Agnostic atheist is an oxymoron, I think.

If you don't believe that a God exists, then you're an atheist. If believe that you can prove you're right, then you're a strong atheist. If you don't think you can prove it, but think it's true even so, in the way that I believe that the Riemann hypothesis is true, say - you'd bet heavily that way, even though you're not sure - then you're a weak atheist.

Agnosticism implies a genuine, non-trivial uncertainty.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Religion/Theology Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC