Reply #24: Real evidence like what? Bush admitting it on Fox? [View All]

[bj2110]

In all of this mess, with Madsen & Curtis & Fisher, statistics is the single viewpoint that cannot be blamed for biased investiagtions, alterior motives, or bad jurnalism. We have to trust the math. It's the single underlying basis for a case for fraud. I am of the opinion that it most definitely occurred. We're not going to get an admission of guilt from the administration. It obviously won't happen. How about an admission from certain secretaries of state, or certain congressman. Won't happen. What's left that will without a doubt prove that this fraud took place? Statistics. Yes, statistics proven under valid assumptions, but statistics nonetheless. Instead of knocking down what is our only avenue, provide advice on how it could be organizing more accurately. Point out and correct the flawed assumptions, don't just say that they could be flawed. Of course they could be. And if you're waiting for solid evidence, I'm not real sure what else you're waiting on. We're not dealing with isolated bank fraud here, this is fairly large scale, and probably devised by many people who are much more intelligent than you, I, or anyone else who posts on this board. We have enough to go on right now. Hence the Arnebeck lawsuit. Support that. Support the underlying statistics.