You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #37: No, they're too arrogant. Or Yes, there are "sleeper cells" here. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU
tommcintyre Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-02-04 03:21 AM
Response to Original message
37. No, they're too arrogant. Or Yes, there are "sleeper cells" here.
Either possibility is plausible;

A - The potential arrogance is a historic disease of this kind of (self) deluding type of organization. The combination of success and righteousness inherently breeds arrogance (overconfidence). (Actually, exploiting this arrogance is our best chance of defeating them - along with letting enough time pass and it eventually is their inevitable undoing. Historically, it has never failed.)

B - Rove and company are known to be "control freaks", and do plan well in advance (not sensibly, even for their own long-term survival, just "well" detail-wise for carrying out their agendas). Considering this, it would not be unreasonable to assume that they not only pay people to monitor and disrupt at all different levels, from subtle to overt; but also they most likely have long-term "sleeper cells" here, similar to how Al Queda operates. They were pre-planned, and called into action if certain events occur. (Like vote-fraud investigation "heating up" too much for their comfort level.)

Either way, they must lose eventually - history does bear this out. For people that seem to be so smart, its amazing how they "miss this". Without exception, every similar regime has fallen - even if its purely from the "falseness" of their premises. Everything they are doing has been done before (in one way or another), and the outcome has always been the same - their demise. There is only two differences now. 1) Things move more quickly everyday, so their "shelf-life" will most likely be shorter. 2) The threat of annihilation for all of us (exacerbated by their inherent shortsighted thinking) looms large and is very real.

I know I gave you much more than you asked for here, but I'm hoping if some of "them" do read this post; maybe some of this will "sink in". It doesn't have to be this way. If they would just stop and really think about "all this"...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC