You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #45: The only problem with that... [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Places » Canada Donate to DU
V. Kid Donating Member (616 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-07-06 02:31 AM
Response to Reply #20
45. The only problem with that...
...is that Afghanistan is ALREADY in a situation of chaos. As was mentioned earlier the militia's control most of the country outside of Kabul. And frankly much of the difference between them, and the Taliban, is insubstantial. It seems as if your rationale for us staying is that it's the moral thing to do, in so far, as we shouldn't let a group (the Taliban) that's rather nasty gain control. But it's not as if the defacto alternative, the average warlord, is any better when it comes to the human rights of the average Afghani citizen, women included. The Karzai government is completely toothless, and they're not particularly great liberal democrats themselves, as they're rather corrupted by fundamentalist extremists too. The Karzai government itself has courted many of these figures, precisely because they need them, to enforce the will of the government. Remember that story about a converted Christian who was going to be put to death? It was government sanctioned. Of course once we heard about that, we put pressure on Karzai to step in and put a stop to it. But nonetheless, these sorts of elements exist in the Afghani government.

Also, while you mention Oil, and Imperialism, and the fact that you don't think that those things are a part of NATO's mission. I'd argue that they do play a part in the mission. The US gov't wants Afghanistan to be a country that's stable enough to build pipelines through, so they can export Oil, and other fossil fuels, from Central Asian countries through to ports in places like Pakistan. In fact various Oil companies were attempting to do business with the Taliban during the late 90's.

Frankly, other than getting the Americans off our backs for not joining in the Iraqi fun, and hoping for a complete change in course, there really isn't much of a moral reason from the standpoint of traditional Canadian peacekeeping values, for us to be there. And I'd say Layton is right to advocate that we change the dynamic and get every player at the table, to try to organize for a more sustainable peace. Like it or not, but the Taliban is a major player in Afghanistan.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Places » Canada Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC