Reply #95: your reply on 64 asked for information that was supplied in the OP [View All]

[grantcart]

Everyone observing your obtuse behavior on this thread can make their own judgements.


I refuse to waste my time on somebody that pisses on a thread without reading, then hijacks it with repetitive meme that have been proven to be untrue or fallacious and now asks me basic questions that were already answered in the OP.

You jumped in a thread that examined polls going back 2 years that involved researching the background of the pollster and a parsing of why somebody who has been the President of the Phoenix Chamber of Commerce would be saying that McCain "could be in a horse race in Arizona" and at the same time the Obama campaign is, strangely enough increasing its campaign activity by sending Michelle Obama there shortly after the polls have come out even though there are no primaries or caucuses there.

The primary thrust of the OP has been clearly stated, carefully researched, and all of the original sources carefully cited.

Yet within a short few minutes of the posting you have posted unsupported, threadbare criticism stating simply "It is flawed" with no countervailing sources or seperate polling data to reinforce one statement of your criticism.

Now you have spent the last hours repeating the same points, with no discourse despite the fact that additional information including the fact that McCain only achieved 50% in the Arizona Republican Party Primary and the fact that the Obama has dispensed its most valuable surrogate Michelle Obama to campaign in Phoenix not too long after the poll was issued.

Nothing you have brought forth has diminished, qualified or undermined the basic premise of the OP that McCain is surprisingly soft in his home state and that if current trends were to continue that it would be a "horse race" and McCain would have to expend resources in his home state to make sure that it doesn't become a full fledged swing state with the possibilitiy of going for Obama in the General Election.