You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #45: Some big, consequential differences, in my opinion. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
DLnyc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-24-08 08:30 PM
Response to Original message
45. Some big, consequential differences, in my opinion.
1. On energy policy, Obama has come out clearly for investing in solar and wind technologies, which both creates jobs and moves us into a sustainable energy future. My sense is that Clinton's energy policy would be more likely to pander to coal and corporate agriculture, providing neither new jobs nor sustainable energy (but, to be fair, good for votes in WV).

2. Obama's speech on the Americas two days ago outlined a foreign policy there that focuses on improving economic conditions for the poor as well as encouraging democratic forms of government. Also, he emphasized partnership instead of bullying. The foreign policy in SA and Latin America I would expect from Clinton, based on her advisors, would instead continue to focus on funding right-wing governments like Columbia's and emphasize protecting US and multinational banking interests at the expense of the economic well-being of ordinary South and Latin Americans.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=385x136736

3. Obama has promised a confident approach to international relations that would emphasize dialog and real diplomacy. Clinton has mostly focused on how 'tough' she would be, a dangerous approach and too much like the current one, in my opinion.
http://www.fpif.org/fpiftxt/4940

4. In the style of his campaign, as well as his statements and his life choices, it seems to me Obama would work 'bottom-up' and emphasize motivating and empowering the American people to drive real change, whereas Clinton would probably work in a top-down manner, deciding what she (and the powerful interests that she is quite tangled up with) thinks is best and then using power and ad campaigns to convince people that is the right thing to do.

5. In his approach, Obama has already encouraged many people to try to bridge some of gaps which have, for a long long time, kept Americans divided and easily manipulated. Clinton, on the other hand, both before this campaign and during it, has consistently exacerbated tensions and fears.

All in all, I think Obama will be a great president, Hillary would be an okay president and McCaint would be absolutely fucking disastrous puppet-like clueless nonentity who should not be allowed to even LOOK at the White House, let alone enter it.

(For my 1000th post, by the way.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC