Obama knows that it is foolish to punish the troops for the poor decisions of their commanders. Obama didn't vote for funding 'to invade and occupy Iraq'. Our troops were already there.
By your logic, perhaps Congress should cut funding for Walter Reed. After all, most of the veterans there were injured as a result of an illegal war. Whether they are in combat or lying in a hospital bed with stumps where arms and legs used to be, our nation has a responsibility to make sure our troops receive the best protection and the best care possible.
Are you seriously suggesting that one can't support the troops and oppose the war at the same time?
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
