34. the bottom line: Mikulski still has NOT endorsed Lamont
they can tap dance and twist around and spin anything they want to ... they can properly cite the Senate rules that preclude campaigning on the taxpayer's dime ... they can do anything they want to ...
but, in the end, in a race that sends a primary winning DEMOCRAT against someone who chose to not accept the verdict from Democratic voters, Mikulski has apparently decided not to back the Democrat in the race ... it's her right to do that but it's incredibly disappointing and she certainly shouldn't HIDE behind the Senate rules ... she owes you and all of us a clear statement of why she refused to endorse the Democratic Party's nominated candidate ...
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
