Reply #231: We can't afford a mole in the Voter Reform efforts this Party is making... [View All]

[Totally Committed]

and her friendship with Rove, along with her seeming willingness to go along with any plan that can give her political power (I mean, she endorsed Bush after Katrina, fercripessake!), I can't trust her, her judgement, her Party loyalty, and she's DLC on top of all of that.

This Party's penchant for shooting itself in the foot, and then hiding under a chair instead of fighting doesn't make me confident that she is the right choice, nor that she would be given the correct oversight while she does the job. Do we REALLY want to wonder about the head of this program if, gawdhelpus, the next elections appear to be stolen? Is this just an example of the other side putting a mole into our program so they not only will know what's going on, but also will give us no recourse to complain when we lose? --- I can hear her now on tv the day after the elections --- "No, there was little or no voter fraud that we could find in this election. I think the Democrats were weak, and lost it fair and square and we'll just have to do better next time..."

The RNC will be in like Flynn, and the DLC will be all set to say "We told you so..." I really, sincerely think this is a set-up, and she's the tip-off we are ignoring if we don't demand a replacement.

I used to really admire Donna. But, over the years since 2000, she has given me more and more reasons no to trust her as far as I can throw her.

TC