Reply #213: so tell me what reborn donna is doing?? did she do anything in san diego?? [View All]

[flyarm]

i just got home tonight from a dem fundraiser..and i have this in my email

Seems Duvall County is sending machines home with staff over night
rather than SOE employees picking them up and delivering to sites by 10
am .....

so please do tell me what "reborn fucking donna brazile" has done anywhere in this country for voting integrity??

i get this in my mail begging me for help from a campaign person in fla...

so do please tell me, i am waiting , what the fuck donna brazile has done?????????????other than go to lunches with karl fucking rove!

i sure haven't seen a damn bit of help or even acknowledgement of our problems in fla!

none zero zip!

i can tell you this..she sure has dem party in my fla county scared to death to speak out about the machines..terrified to!

and i can tell you this also..it has been my money and money of the good citizens of my county who have put their own money up to gtry to get voting integrity..with out a damn bit of donnas help or support..

where was donna on this??????????????????and be aware of this..this passed only after the supervisor replaced the new software with the old to get the system to pass the test..and she hid most of the testing from the people there to observe the test!!

this statement it there fore bullshit!

The result was a good one for Supervisor of Elections Office officials, who on Wednesday had grappled with a voting system that fell short during what's called a logic and accuracy test.


http://www.sptimes.com/2006/08/18/Tampabay/Voting_system_finally.shtml

Voting system finally passes
A voting rights advocate, however, says after the test that she wouldn't trust the machines.
By WILL VAN SANT, Times Staff Writer
Published August 18, 2006

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

After having failed the first time around, Pinellas County's voting system passed a pre-election check on Thursday.

Voting machines will be delivered to polling sites today so that early voting for the Sept. 5 primary can begin as scheduled on Monday.
The result was a good one for Supervisor of Elections Office officials, who on Wednesday had grappled with a voting system that fell short during what's called a logic and accuracy test.

But voting rights advocates who observed the process were not impressed.

"I wouldn't trust these machines," said Linda McGeehan, a vice president of the St. Petersburg League of Women Voters. "I feel much more insecure now after seeing this."
The logic and accuracy test involves running a controlled election with a determined outcome and seeing whether the system delivers a correct result.

Election officials said they ran two tests of the system before Wednesday's failed one. In each case, the result was a success: the control and final results matched.
The way the second test was held Thursday irked the League of Women Voters' McGeehan.
Under state law, logic and accuracy tests are open to public scrutiny. Yet for much of the day, McGeehan said the ability to observe was constrained.

And promises by election officials to provide an explanation for the system's initial failure were slow in coming.
Supervisor of Elections Deborah Clark said it had been decided to first attempt a successful test before addressing the concerns of observers like McGeehan so that delays to her office's work schedule could be avoided.


fly