You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #25: No, what's inexcusable is that Lamont's supporters [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
dolstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-15-06 01:59 AM
Response to Reply #16
25. No, what's inexcusable is that Lamont's supporters
somehow expect that their nominee should get a free pass in the general election simply because he convinced slightly more than 20% of the states registered Democrats to vote for him in the primary.

What's inexcusable is the utter contempt that Lamont's supporters have for the remaining 80% of the electorate. Apparently, they don't feel that their candidate has any obligation to work to earn the support of any of these other voters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC