You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #12: "it's not up to them to create the news" [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
welshTerrier2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-04-06 12:43 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. "it's not up to them to create the news"
well, that's the crux of it right there ...

first of all, it's not "creating the news" to write about the out of control defense budget (i'll stick to this example for now) ... it certainly is fair to argue that when there's a big story, like, for example, when Congress passes a large defense appropriation, it gets coverage ... no disagreement there ...

but millions were spent 10 days ago and 9 days ago and 8 days ago and so on ... what are the requirements of good journalism? should the story only receive coverage in response to an annual budget cycle? doesn't that sort of suggest that journalists have the attention span of gnats?

do authors and professors and left-wingers speak out on this issue almost everyday? is what they are saying getting coverage? do they get to appear on MTP or are their little speeches covered in the NY Times? is the issue given the kind of prominence it deserves given that it is strangling our country and that it is draining precious resources away from so many other programs?

i understand the point you're making ... i suppose some might be comforted by the idea of a non-agenda driven press merely calling the balls and strikes after the pitcher throws the ball ... i see the role of the media very differently ... i think a healthier state of affairs would include a vibrant press that aggressively pursues the diversity of views in the society and thoroughly analyzes them on a regular basis ... i see a health media as the voice of ALL the people ... and i see a healthy media as one that regularly challenges the status quo and exposes the society to alternatives ...

in the more passive view, which i think is far more prominent, the media do little more than give voice to those in power ... whether ideological or otherwise, today's MSM becomes a tool for the rich and powerful and opposing opinions are not very welcomed ... perhaps it is laziness or perhaps it is some view of "journalistic ethics" (we just "report" the news), but the result is that the "fourth estate" has abdicated its responsibilities to act as a check and balance on the ruling classes ... instead, it has become their press agents ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC