Reply #33: None of them are. [View All]

[jobycom]

They've been claiming she's banning video games, banning flag burning, calling for more troops in Iraq, not calling for withdrawal, not being liberal--none of it's true. Read up on each of those issues and you'll find she's 100% liberal. Her plan for withdrawal is a timetable, not immediate withdrawal, and I disagree in part with that, but she's not pro-invasion, not in favor of keeping our troops there, not supporting Bush. She just knows a lot more about getting things done than most DUers, so she approaches issues with the idea of actually solving the problem, instead of feeding the egos of so-called liberals.

I've disagreed with things she's done, and I've got some issues with her as far as her presidential qualifications, but all this swiftboating is getting old. In earl 2001 half the DUers (much smaller group then) claimed Al Gore was a DINO and didn't deserve to win. Now some of the same people claim he's a liberal champion and that the DLC destroyed him. The people who destroyed him were the so-called liberals who are now doing the same thing to H. Clinton. Write their names down. If she announces she's not running, the same people condemning her now will be claiming she was our liberal champion and was destroyed by the DLC.