You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #41: Agreed. They have to report on the winner [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
DemBones DemBones Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-04-04 04:54 PM
Response to Reply #35
41. Agreed. They have to report on the winner

of the primaries . And they're doing a pretty good job of covering all the campaigns on primary nights. Larry King did brief interviews with Kucinich and Sharpton last night. Then Larry asked David Gergen, Bob Dole, Bill Schneider, and Wolf Blitzer why candidates like Kucinich and Sharpton stay in the race. Schneider was chuckling as he pointed out that they'd just gotten on Larry King's show and had a bit of time to discuss their messages. He's right because that's how the game is played.

I keep thinking that if more people heard Kucinich's message, more would vote for him, but I'm coming to the conclusion that most people are more conservative than I am. Before you say "Duh!" what I'm saying is that I think many more people agree with Kucinich than vote for him. (This may be true of Dean, too.) One reason that has been discussed in relation to all the candidates is electability.

But beyond that, I think that some people who agree with DK but don't vote for him make that choice because they think it would be too much of a shock to put him in power and have so many changes accomplished in a short time. Even if they feel that they themselves can handle rapid change, they're unsure that the rest of society can handle it. Perhaps they're right, perhaps people are dizzy from the sudden sprint to the right we've seen since 2000 and can't take a huge swing to the left this year.

Thus the voters are looking at all the horses in the stable Mairead spoke of and asking themselves which horse can win the race and, upon taking power, restore the country to a sort of normalcy. Someone last night described John Kerry as a professional and a "plodder" who knows how to get things done. Maybe that's what we need in the immediate future, someone who'll methodically undo the damage done to our Constitution, federal budget, and foreign policy, and begin implementing some of the changes that are needed. When the country is stabilized, we can start making progress again. Sounds slow and boring, I know, but it may be necessary.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC