You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #16: my mother-in-law was one of those people who carried on about [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
catmother Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-06-06 05:53 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. my mother-in-law was one of those people who carried on about
"the will". i can't speak for my sister-in-law, but my husband and i were never interested in her money. no one has ever given us anything. everything that we have we have worked for. we just have my husband's daughter -- and all she wants is money. after my mother-in-law died she kept sending my husband notes and e-mails saying things like "i know it's hard -- hang in there" once he told her that "nana" died penniless the notes stopped.

we have our will set up that everything goes to animal charities. my sister is our executrix and will make sure that our wishes are carried out. of course, if an illness happens our estate would go the way of my mother-in-laws. my husband is covered for long term care, but they won't cover me because i have chronic fatigue syndrome and take certain drugs for it. so if i get sick, we could lose everything, house, savings. we're long overdue for universal health care.

and i agree with the class warfare. you can't just keep people down. i see people all the time busting their asses for $8.00 an hour and no future to look forward to. the american dream is all but over.

we are truly blessed that my husband has been rewarded for his 36 years with the same company -- but we're scared -- his job could be outsourced tomorrow. he is eligible for a pension, but he's only 58 so we'd have to wait for him to hit 62 for social security.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC