You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #44: environment, fiscal policy, religion-government separation [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
AJH032 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-15-05 04:32 PM
Response to Original message
44. environment, fiscal policy, religion-government separation
1. Strong environmental rules are absolutely necessary to preserving life and beauty on this planet. Who says being technologically productive and being environmentally friendly have to be mutually exclusive things? We can be even more productive if we use more environmentally clean energy that is more efficient than what we use now, and the more we use it and standardize it, the cheaper it will be, so the supply-side of the market won't be hurt in the end (Republicans can't seem to grasp this concept).

2. Our government's fiscal policies play a major role and have major effects on our economy, obviously. Forget the spending side for now (which of course is also very important), and just look at revenue and how we allocate taxes. There are several paths to choose. We could put in place taxation policies that encourage more outsourcing of jobs, increase competition among workers (by adding millions of people to the American company's choice of workers), and generate lower wages so we have a depleted consumer-side of the U.S. market, even if prices do go down (if at all, as most of the extra revenue will go into the company's profits, not into lowering the prices unless they need to to stay competetive). Or, we could limit outsourcing and the opposite would happen. Additionally, we could encourage businesses of any size to be more productive by making it more tax-friendly for them to re-invest a large portion of their revenue into their own productivity (ie, hiring more workers, designers, creating better products, encouraging competition), or we could limit corporate taxes and allow profits to build up while everyone else suffers (except maybe the resource market). I'm not advocating we put a cap on profits, because this would encourage companies to be less productive. I'm only encouraging a more graduated corporate tax, so as a company makes more, they pay more (but at no point would they be better off by not making a profit). Okay, this is already too long, because this is a very complicated issue. But I think I've made my point.

3. This one's very simple. Religion out of government. Everyone in the United States should be free to practice whatever religion s/he chooses, so long as they don't disrupt others. This goes for all branches of government, including the SCOTUS.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC