You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #110: You are putting words in my mouth, and I rather wish you'd stop [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
fishwax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-18-04 09:35 AM
Response to Reply #106
110. You are putting words in my mouth, and I rather wish you'd stop
I never said this wasn't a big deal to teach a 7-yr-old. But just because a 7-yr-old sees it, doesn't mean he is "taught" it. I said that it is not a foregone conclusion that all parents would be upset by this kind of thing, which is pretty true. The parental model I most respect and that I have seen be most effective is the one whereby parents *explain* these things, as you apparently do. Congratulations, it sounds like you take that responsibility seriously, and that is worthy of respect.

The parental model that consistently fails is the one whereby parents don't want their kids to know anything, and when anything potentially offensive comes up they don't want to talk about it, just change the channel and pretend it doesn't exist, so the kid can get all his information online or on the playground.

As far as the Coors commercial, I agree that it is degrading to women. And further, I thought that the mimed sexual violence of the super bowl show was offensive, but the nipple was no big deal. The mnf spot shows a sexual aggression by a female (itself extremely offensive concept to fundies, who don't think women should have ANY control over their sexuality), but doesn't show a woman as a victim. It seems to me that subtle (and not so subtle) violences against women are prevalent in popular culture. The proper response, in my opinion, is not to say "kids shouldn't see that!" but rather to say "violence against women should not be acceptable, and the public should be educated to reject images and themes which subtly perpetuate these offensives." Then, maybe if a man aggressively rips the shirt off of a woman, the public will be mad at the man for violating the woman, rather than mad at the woman for having her nipple exposed.

And finally ... "if it is wrong for my kids, it is wrong for the neighbor kids" ... does your neighbor get a say in that, or is that your final decision? Shall we all bow to our neighbor's will in raising our children? If your neighbor doesn't allow his children to watch movies that don't promote a Biblical worldview (I have known plenty of parents that are that way), will you assent to his standards and impose the same on your children? I'm not asking these questions to be sarcastic ... they are at the very heart of the larger question.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC