Reply #41: which came first, the chicken or the egg? [View All]

[ChairmanAgnostic]

what has happened is that there is a reflexive attacke by HRCers against those of us who have tried long and hard to find a reason to support her, and cannot in good faith do so. It is not hatred, it is a rational choice. I care not one bit for someone who leads from the rear, seeing how the winds blow before taking a stance. If a tough issue comes up, she ducks until her focus groups and polling data are back.

Name one issue, except flag burning (and she was wrong on that, too) that she led on in the senate.

without a famous, talented hubbie, she'd still be a hack lawyer in Arkansas.

I attended an ABA convention a year before Bill announced his candidacy. on the last day of my division's meetings, we were told that one of the top ten trial lawyers in the country would speak AND she was a woman! It was Hillary. Except, she had only one trial under her belt solo, and little other trial experience. It was a sham put up job. It was PR spin by her paid staff. It was bullshit and it was nothing more than a way to introduce bill to a bunch of real trial lawyers. She was a liar then, she was a liar about her billing records, she continues to lie whenever it can help her. My personal dealings with her at the convention (there were more than a few - I chaired a big section) left a very bad taste in my mouth. She was arrogant, offensive and extremely cold and calculating.

No, the defensiveness, the attacks by Hillarians, and their refusal to face facts is more than half the problem. In fact, I'd venture to say that it is more than 52% of the problem.

and no on EVER can get elected when more than half the people hate her or will never vote for her. To suggest otherwise is to be as delusional as Dick Cheney on Iraq.