You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #37: That must be a rhetorical question, because that's not quite how it works.... [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-28-06 04:26 PM
Response to Reply #25
37. That must be a rhetorical question, because that's not quite how it works....
It is like the Howard Dean "scream".

It is like the swiftboating of John Kerry during election 2004 and "the Joke" 2006.

It's like a daily fox memo of talking points from the producers to the staff......(do you really think that they are the only one with a memo?)

It's like an avalanche that starts out small and ends up big. Newsweek writes about the "contenders", which in turn is discussed on Hardball (since Newsweek and NBC are partners), the NBC nightly News, and next thing you know, such and such is a guest on Tim Russert and Jay Leno. Time Magazine moves in with another article from a Pundit, which is then discussed by CNN (owned by the same folks), which is followed by an ABC segment on the news (CNN and Disney's ABC are also loose partners) and a Sunday sting on Stenephapolous(sp?) and Oprah. It is an notion which pretty soon becomes conventional wisdom after repeated exposure.

It is like the March to War that was "performed" by the networks and the cable triplets. Done in a clean seamless and Simultaneous loosely coordinated fashion. It is done as part of the daily operation of most of the nationwide media.

And don't forget about the news wire system which will run a story dissiminated everywhere in the U.S. with a rivalring/complimentary story that shows up in the NTY and WAPO!

It is like a fire that starts out insignificantly small but soon ignites and roars past and burns everything in its path in an out of control way. That is our media in 2006.

When they did away with the Fairness Doctrine, there was a reason. When the telecomunications act was signed in 1996, that had an effect.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC