You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #8: A scenario to refute your assertion: [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » September 11 Donate to DU
jim3775 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-12-05 01:03 PM
Response to Original message
8. A scenario to refute your assertion:
Okay, the plane is traveling at 600 mph, the nose hits the ground causes the ground to become unstable and break up creating a crater, this happens in a fraction of a second. Now, the nose has hit the ground and the tail is still going at 600 mph yet to hit the ground. The crater has already been formed; the tail hits the crater at 600 mph and the black boxes drive into the crater 25 or so feet underground.


Just because the nose and fuselage of the plane have hit the ground and stopped doesn't mean the tail is stopped too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » September 11 Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC