Reply #112: That's a good question! [View All]

[RH]

Having closely followed the "No Boeing" nonsense from the start I seriously suspect that the issue has been deliberately pumped up by some participants especially to prove the foolishness of the conspiracy theory opposition. Looked at from a distance it is pretty much as if they are trying to win a bet to see who can get the World to believe the most absurd proposition.

Early last year I produced "They saw the Aircraft", a comprehensive compendium of eye witness reports and then "Spot the Lamp Poles", a collection of photos and physical analysis to refute the idiots such as Thierry Meyssan who had said that a plane could not have hit the Pentagon because lamp poles would then have been damaged:

http://www.dragonslair.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/77/poles_.htm

At that stage I'd therefore expected that to pretty much be the end of the matter. The idiots were simply wrong on crucial matters of fact and up until then I'd beieved in their pretension to objectively seek the truth.

Thereafter their true nature was more and more apparent. When refuted they carried on to display an insultingly contrived ignorance that could only possibly have been deliberately dishonest, and with a continually persistent hyped up style much more befitting of show biz propaganda than to any serious discipline of science.

And in the mean time there must at least have been a conspiracy of silence from those who know better. Somebody somewhere is surely sitting on more than enough evidence to have long since dispatched, overnight, the nonsense to the garbage can where it belongs, but they chose instaed to let it go on.