Reply #52: I think 77 hit the Pentagon, Abe. [View All]

[Old and In the Way]

Because I've not seen compelling evidence to believe an alternative scenario.

That said, I can understand how some might believe otherwise, (I was certainly in that camp for awhile).

(1) To date, I have seen no pictorial evidence of a 757 in the crash photo's I've seen. I've seen a single engine fan compressor unit, but that's about it.

(2) I think if 100 people had stumbled upon the Pentagon 30 seconds after the crash and each was asked their opinion of what had just occured, maybe 1/100 would have deduced a 757 had hit the building.

But I suspect that it's been in this administration's interest to withhold physical evidence that would end this controversy. It's to their advantage to have the "no plane struck the Pentagon" kept afloat to distract us from focusing on bigger questions regarding the event. Like:

(1) Why was the Pentagon /Washington, DC without fighter cover 52+ minutes after the 2nd WTC crash.

(2) How could the fingered pilot-terrorist possible pull this off given his piss poor Cessna flying record and the flightpath that Washington ATC had tracked 77 on in it's final moments?


Trying to float an alternative theory like having the people debarked onto 93 without a single scrap of evidence to back your assertion is a real stretch. If you can point me to where there is hard evidence to support your contention, I'd be glad to check it out, though.