Reply #45: Paul [View All]

[Bolo Boffin]

Where have I suggested that "the FBI knows better than we do and it's not for us to question their wisdom"? All I am suggesting is that they might have reasons for letting disinformation out that are more...innocent (FLOABW) than many here are willing to admit. That suggestion doesn't and shouldn't imply any approval of mine to that at all. It's only throwing another possibility out there.

Read the chapter in my book on Nabil al-Marabh. If that guy isn't a guilty terrorist than nobody is, and I've uncovered even more evidence on him since then. He was probably one of the 9/11 operational masterminds, as the FBI originally declared to be. Yet they simply dropped all charges and deported him to Syria last year.

That could be. al-Marabh could also now be a double agent. That also could be.

My main point, Paul, is that many of the conspiracy theories around here seem to cling to this switching of hijackers. I'm demonstrating that this doesn't threaten the accepted theory at all. Most of what I read is a lot of baiting to switch people over to laughable theories like Flight 77 denial and missile pod nonsense.

Have you been blind to all the reports of the Bush Administration's manipulation of the intelligence agencies to get them to say what they want to hear, not what they think the truth is?

Nope. The Bushies really like people who tell them what they want to hear. No argument from me at all on that. Repeat: I don't view the
FBI as benevolent and wise. That isn't necessary (thank God) to still subscribe to the accepted theory.