Reply #37: Sorry Bolo [View All]

[John Doe II]

There is room inside the accepted explanation for mix-n-match hijackers. We know they stole identities and doctored passports. So what if the hijacker who had been using the identity of Hamza Alghamdi used the identity of Hani Hanjour that day?

Sorry, but Hazma is supposed to have been aboard UA 175....

Has it ever occured to you that the Feds not releasing everything they know cuts both ways? That perhaps the release of disinformation is possibly motivated not only to hide one's own culpability, but to mask what one actually knows about the enemy, to keep them guessing?

If one says Hani boarded AA 77 if he didn't board what the hell does this mask "what one actually knows about the enemy, to keep them guessing"?
Whith this logic you really can explain all cover-ups!

Bolo, the Hani story is very simple:
Do you think only the hairline is different in the pics?
Then please explain why Hani needed different hair that day? Shouldn't be to good idea to have a different hairline if one travels with Hani's passport?

And if you consider the possibility that Hani didn't board and didn't fly the plane and you write:

Again I ask: What does this prove?

May I ask you
Why does the Commission lie about the identity of Hani?
Do you consider a story a cover-up if all official explanations are proven to have been lies or does one clear lie in the official explanation raise your eyebrowse?