Reply #76: Arguing against what? Vague paranoid suspicions? [View All]

[William Seger]

Actually, I've been trying to explain to you why your claims would be ultimately irrelevant to 9/11 "inside job" conspiracism even if they were correct, but in fact there http://www.911myths.com/index.php/Hijackers_still_alive">doesn't seem to be any good reason to accept your claim that "7 or 8 of the REAL ID's were still alive." There was some confusion on some of the names in the first few days after the attack, but that seems to be pretty much sorted out now.

But I don't really care to argue about that, since it's really pointless: Even if your claims were accurate, arguing about the "real" names of 7 hijackers is to ignore the significance of the fact that most of the hijackers were indeed identified as particular people connected with radical Islamist terrorism, and those people seem to have disappeared for some reason. In the end, your argument is simply that you aren't convinced that the hijackers were Arab terrorists, and I don't care to waste time trying to convince you that they were. The reason I'm sure that it would be a waste of time is that while you say there isn't enough evidence to suit you, you simply dismiss out-of-hand the evidence that we do have, e.g. the manifests, the passenger calls, the communications with the ATCs, the last will videos (and presumably much more, such as the bin Laden "confession" video). Again, I don't care about what you don't believe, so I don't know why you would expect me to argue with you about that. But you seem to persist in missing why I keep saying that, so I'll be more explicit: Tell me what you do believe and why you believe it, and then we'll see if you've got anything besides paranoid suspicions, assumptions, and speculations.

As it is, you don't seem to have much of an argument, and it's getting kinda boring to keep repeating why I think that, so if you've said all you have to say, so have I.