Reply #67: KA-CHUNK [View All]

[Kalun D]

"> "how did they establish the 19 boarded the planes?""

"From the flight manifests."

Which we've never been shown. You'd think if it was an up front deal we would have seen complete lists on DAY ONE, or at least the 1st week. Why hide them? Although some "victim" lists were shown on 9-12 that contained ZERO Arab names. How did they know in ONE day who the hijackers were? How did they figure out in ONE day that these 19 were so definitely guilty? Is that the way investigations are normally conducted? Do they indict convict and sentence people for a crime this grave and complex in ONE day? Or were they just "suspects"? Then why did they leave mere "suspects" off the lists?

"> "how did they ID the 19?""

"The used their "real" names to get their tickets (or at least the same names that they had been using for some time)."

Thank you so very much for falling right into my trap.

So you admit then that there were false identities. And if some are false how do you confirm that any of them are true?

And we know the FBI admitted that the lists were inaccurate when 7 of them worldwide claimed they were still alive.

This is where the gov's conspiracy theory falls flat on it's face. Because if the identities the 19 gave the airlines, and the identities that the gov has given us are false, then what are their REAL identities? And how come after 8 years they haven't found a single one of the correct identities? Is the FBI that incompetent? How do you convict 19 people in the court of public opinion, like they have been, if their identities are false?

So with false identities, who are the people in the 19 photos? Are they the people on the planes? Or are they the people who's identities have been stolen?

This could all be cleared up very very easily. So since it has not been cleared up at all it makes the gov look very suspicious.

Tell us Mr Seger, how many video cameras on average do you think existed at each of the departing airports on 911?

Let's see probably the entrances to the buildings. For sure the baggage counters, for sure the security gates, for sure the boarding gates. So let's say 3 possibly 4 camera locations, let's guess just 4 cameras for each location, a minimum guess. Say 12 cameras bare minimum at each airport. So every single one of the 19 got by 12 cameras each without one single one of them being videoed.

How could that be possible? The answer is it could not be possible. So in other words the video cameras don't show the same people who are in the 19 photographs of unknown source of the supposed hijackers who supposedly were using false ID's. Otherwise this hard evidence would have already been shown because what they have besides that is pretty flimsy.

So according to the gov the 19 got on the planes, there's just no video proof that they did. In fact there's no video at all. WHY?

WHY IS THERE NO VIDEO AT ALL FROM THE AIRPORTS? BECAUSE IT DOESN'T SHOW WHAT IT'S SUPPOSED TO?

"> "how did they establish the 19 were piloting the planes?""

"From the reports by the passengers, and from the communications with the ATCs."

So the supposed 19, who have false identities are now ID'd as being in the cockpit. I'm assuming all we have is written transcripts provided by the gov? No audio tape? No audio voice ID? Did they give their first and last names when checking in with ATC's? Did the passengers know their full names and call them in as they were being held hostage? Was this with their false names, or their real names?

If the names were false how were they matched up with the photos via radio and phone communications? If there's no video from the airports how do we know the false names match up with the pictures provided later on?

How would this kind of case play out in a court of law?

How would you establish these guys were actually who the gov says they were and were on the planes and in the cockpits? How would that hold up in court and wouldn't the lack of video evidence come into question?