The OCT is based on a foundation of lies [View All]

[NowHearThis]

It all begins with Barbara Olson, wife of the then U.S. Solicitor General Ted Olson. According to the OCT, Mrs. Olson was aboard
AA FL77 which is said to have taken off from Dulles airport.

Mrs. Olson supposedly called her husband while aboard FL77 and reported the KEY facts which were used by BUSHCO when it promulgated
the Official 9/11 Conspiracy Theory.

Ted Olson said that his wife told him that the plane she was on had been hijacked by some young Arab men wearing bandannas and who
were armed with box cutters. Ted gave conflicting accounts of various aspects of the alleged calls. He said they were made from
her cell phone. He also said they were made from a seatback phone. He said she told him that all of the passengers had been
herded to the back of the plane. He also said that she told him that the hijackers told all of the passengers to call their loved
ones to tell them goodbye.

Regardless of the conflicting accounts of the MINOR details of what she allegedly told Ted, the KEY facts she allegedly told
Ted are what formed the basis for the OCT: Arab hijackers, wearing bandannas, hijacked airliners by using box cutters as weapons.

I've previously posted an explanation of what I believe probably happened to Mrs. Olson and why I believe she was an innocent Patsy
in the 9/11 events. No one has yet to make a substantive rebuttal to that explanation.

I've also said that there is no credible evidence that Mrs. Olson made any phone calls from aboard a commercial airliner on the morning of 9/11. I've challenged the Untruthers here to provide proof of those calls, but so far, no one has provided any credible evidence that supports the claim that Mrs. Olson made any calls to Ted Olson from an airliner on 9/11.

Unless and until it is proven that those calls were made from AA FL77, it is reasonable to conclude that the entire OCT is a lie.