Reply #159: A lot to catch up on . .. [View All]

[defendandprotect]

Unfortunately my list of posts doesn't seem to want to report on dungeon replies!

Basically, I like to see anyone's idea honestly looked at and followed and not bullied off
the field -- and I find your idea very interesting. Though, truth be told, I probably lean
more to the "no planes" theory.

Coming to the "duplication" . . . even a "no planes" concept requires at least ONE PLANE
to be flown around, especially close to the Pentagon. I recall reading somewhere that
there was a plane reported "missing." Whether military or commercial, I don't recall if
it was mentioned. Plane found -- seemingly returned -- later that day. IMO, there is
quite a knot to be untangled re flights that weren't actually scheduled, flights that
may be duplicates -- and the flight that landed in Cleveland. And, could the "duplicate"
have been the first flight 175 which took off?

I have to correct you - A Boston-La Guardia flight doesn't take an hour; without delays, it may last only 35-40 minutes. Miller's timeline is consistent, I've checked it.

My daughter went to college in Boston and flew regularly to and from Newark.
Most times she had arrived early and was waiting for us--!!
Rarely did her whole trip, getting off and finding luggage exceed an hour.
Miller's flight is supposedly leaving at 8:28 . . . ?
Even allowing 35 minutes -- and it could be 30 minutes . . . that's just 8:58.

Planes hit WTC towers at 8:40 and 8:56.

They also made some weird turns, if I recall correctly . . . ?

In reflecting back on other conspiracies, it seems that almost immediately many people
knew the outlines of what had happened and generally those responsible. I think we've
been very fortunate that so many dedicated themselves to finding the truth -- and
I'm confident that that will happen again re 9/11. Sadly, one of the truths we have
to face about political violence in the past is that no one seems to have the power to
bring the truth to its logical conclusion - prosecution.