statements made during the hearings on the part of the military. Since then the commission forward information to the Secretary General for investigation into possible charges. In addition the actual tapes of communications that day were released and have been analyzed. In light of the recorded evidence there is little point in continuing to suggest we don't know the facts with regard to the military response.
Why did the military officals mislead and even lie to the Commission? That can be debated and perhaps another investigation can give us better answers.
I still wouldn't say there were 7 "offical stories"
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
