You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #2: my viewpoint [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » September 11 Donate to DU
OudeVanDagen Donating Member (256 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-01-04 07:54 AM
Response to Original message
2. my viewpoint
FEMA was based on, and still closely follows the old national response plans established by the NCD or National Civil Defense ... so it will deploy USAR teams and other support and logistical efforts regionally ... 3 regions (East, Central, West) that for over 60 years are still called RED, WHITE, and BLUE.

USAR teams are selected and rejected by FEMA by an annual review process that considers among other criteria; manpower availability, level of training and number of responses. FEMA will only deploy up to 1/3 of a city's USAR to a disaster site so that 2/3 will be available for the lending city and for rotation of crews.

Every USAR team deployed by FEMA is accompanied by a IST or Incident Support Team. IST will among other things be the go-between to expedite actions and communications between the Incident Command at a disaster and the USAR teams and deal with other collateral agencies.

IST will normally arrive days before the USAR will participate in a drill or practice session. IST will very often be present in a city that is conducting disaster drills even though USAR isn't being deployed. IST will be the eyes and ears .... observers ... and will offer constructive criticism or take notice of procedures to better define their roles and function.

Collapse investigation follows a very similar protocol ...

It is my experience that dates and times are very often confused by responders to these incidents. Example: Some field notes taken show dates written month-day (9-11) some show day-month (11-9); both mean September 11, 2001 but were just written in ways that can be very confusing. I use military time, I was trained in Army Corps of Engineers; most crews used MT. I'll write 1915, others 7:15 pm.

There has been a great deal of confusion over dates and times in this incident. Common problem, especially when considering the amount of manpower deployed.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » September 11 Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC