Reply #119: I'm sorry to hear this has happened to Dr. Jones, however, . . . [View All]

[Klimmer]

the truth will out. And in the end we win. Even if we have to wait till judgment day.

If BYU is not willing to stand up to the evidence, and allow academic debate regarding these issues, and to tell the truth, and support academic freedom then screw them. Where is their faith in Jesus then?

The image you so kindly provided above shows one of the many classic tell-tale signs of controlled demolition, especially the way the WTC towers were done, CD top to bottom. Yes, the buildings fell at nearly free-fall speeds. The only way this could possibly happen and it completely contradicts the zippering or pan-cake hypothesis is that the floors were sequentially blown one after another on the way down faster than the rate of free-fall allowing the buildings to almost completely turn to dust and fall nearly at at free-fall speeds with little resistance with the exception of air-resistance, hence the time just a little more that free-fall speed in a vacuum.

The classic projectile motion of massive steel beams and debri arching up, out, and sideways as the buildings fell can only happen with appropriately placed and massive enough force to do so --- the CD done by explosives (bombs). This was no ordinary CD, it was excessive in nature, sending debri far from the footprint of the buildings.

A building just falling due to weaknesses falling upon itself (if it could, and the WTC towers could not by design) would not do any of this. It would take much longer than free-fall to completely level, the buildings wouldn't turn to dust and pulverize as they did, and massive steel beam debri wouldn't be sent upward, and outward in classic projectile motion. The forces from simply falling by gravity would be mostly downward not upward and outward as is shown in the image you provided. It wouldn't send debri and show massive explosions as all the footage of both towers clearly demonstrate, over and over again.

After all was said and done the pyro-clastic flow of both buildings, again all caught on video from many sources, goes throughout the city streets and across the harbor. This is classic pyro-clastic flow from explosives, similar to what we see when a volcanoe erupts from a massive explosion of an eruption.

You are deluding yourself to ignore all the visual, physical and eye-witness evidence that we now have from that very infamous day. All the evidence together, and ignoring none of it, all points to CD, not pancake or zipper hypothesis. Sorry, if any evidence from your experiment invalidates your hypothesis, then your hypothesis is invalid --- period. That is how the scientific method works. And so much of the evidence contradicts and invalidates the OCT. All the evidence supports CD, with none of the evidence invalidating the CD hypothesis.

I'm coming to the point of believing anyone who argues the OCT for as long as some of you here at DU have (you know, and we know who you are), always trying to get others to buy into the 9/11 Commission Report view of things as the BCF and the Neo-cons would have it (a white-wash), I can't help but think you're just doing your paid inside job. You are not fooling anyone.

How do you sleep at night? Is your conscience that seared?

Sorry, you may say black is white, and up is down, but I don't see it. White is white, and up is up. You can't change or violate the laws of physics, so stop trying.