You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #67: Didn't you read my message #49? The refraction is not enough. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » September 11 Donate to DU
Carefulplease Donating Member (749 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-05-06 10:06 PM
Response to Reply #59
67. Didn't you read my message #49? The refraction is not enough.
Didn't you read my message #49? There I granted all you assumptions regarding laminar flow. I also assume the refractive index of the warm air to have the smallest possible value for any medium (n = 1) and that the layer of warm air is as much as 20 feet thick. The maximum apparent lateral displacement of a column seen at a 45 degree angle is 0.075 inches. This is nearly three orders of magnitude too small to account for the observed bowing. Where is the mistake in my demonstration? Please read again message #49 and ask some questions if anything is unclear.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » September 11 Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC